tripod is experiencing problems. I'll setup my posts log -- to discourage impersonation by moralphobes
I recently posted this
There you go again: not thinking about what love truly is.
#1a If they were acting in true love they wouldn't be using each other for unnatural sexual
gratification
#1b Is their non-love the same as any kind of love? Clearly not.
#1c1 Can immoral people forge commitments? Sure why not
#1c2 What value is there in an act contrary to love?
#1d Can counter-nature moral deviants raise morally grounded children as well as morally
grounded parents could? Most certainly NOT.
#2a samesex associations cannot be married as this is contrary to the definition of
marriage. Can a circle ever be square? (hint: not yes)
#2b A modicum of common sense shows that males and females are to pair, and no other
combination. Males are attracted to femals and visa versa. One can willfully override
nature. Being able to do something does not necessarily justify an action.
#2c..d Culture is not the authority on the good. This is a fallacy of liberalism.
#3 case2: false premise
###
I'll monitor this url in case any reasonable and rational person would like to pursue civil
discourse. To discourage impersonation I will shortly archive my comments from here and
elsewhere on http://moralphile2004.tripod.com
